May 2008
Volume 10, Number 1 Table of Contents:
President's
Message
by Kevin Kuhn
Of the 8,000 or so attorneys licensed to practice in the District
of Colorado, less than 10% (650) make the choice to belong to
the Faculty of Federal Advocates (“FFA”). It
should be more. This organization, inspired 10 years ago
by Judge Matsch, exists to increase the competency of all attorneys
practicing in the District and to serve as a liaison between
the bench and bar. To that end, the FFA organizes and hosts
some of the best CLE’s around. We enjoy and appreciate
the support of the District’s judges and magistrates in
putting on these educational seminars. The FFA’s “Roundtable” (to
be held this year on November 1, 2008) is a unique opportunity
to meet and learn from all our judges in small groups.
The
Faculty also serves another important role. We serve those
civil clients who cannot afford counsel, and at the same time
assist the courts and provide mentoring training to younger attorneys
wanting federal court experience. If you’re
interested, contact Ed Butler, Esq., the District's Legal Officer for the
Court’s “Counsel/Co-Counsel program,” (303) 335-2043
or email: Edward_Butler@cod.uscourts.gov.
We continue to
need interested attorneys, for both “counsel” [mentor]
and “co-counsel” [mentee] roles.
All of us serve the Court. It’s one of the privileges
and responsibilities of admission, and we continue
to need your participation for the Counsel/Co-Counsel program.
We also need and want your help in suggesting topics for our “brown
bag luncheon” CLE’s as well as Roundtable discussion
topics. Please contact the Faculty’s administrator,
Patricia Murphy, with your ideas. She can be reached at
pmurphyffa@aol.com. And
finally, note that Congress has authorized seven active
District Court judges. Our court is short three, with
the passing of Judge Figa, and the taking of Senior Judge
status by Judges Babcock and Miller. And a quick “geography” note. The “new
and improved” Byron Rogers Courthouse now houses the courtrooms
and chambers of Senior Judge Babcock, Magistrate Judge Hegarty
and will soon be the new location of Judge Miller and his courtroom.
Adjust your parking accordingly.
Make sure your fellow District of Colorado attorneys have
joined the FFA. They owe it to themselves. They’ll
be the better attorney for it. We’re honored to have
a strong and enthusiastic Board of Directors who serve the mission
of the Faculty and welcome your suggestions for how to better
serve our membership and Court. We invite you
to check out the FFA webpage at www.facultyfederaladvocates.org.
Put it on your “favorites” list. It’s
a great resource.
The Faculty has also teamed up with “Our Courts,” a
non-partisan Colorado Bar
Association organization that educates the public on our state
and federal courts, and how our third branch of government works
to serve the public. The Faculty appreciates Judge Krieger’s
help in connecting us with this public service organization.
Check out more about “Our Courts” and how you can
serve it by heading to ourcourtscolorado.org or
emailing ourcourts@cobar.org.
And last, but most importantly, the Faculty honors the memory
and legacy of the late Judge Phil Figa. He is greatly missed.
[top of page]
Judge
Wiley Daniel’s CLE on Top Ten Do’s and Don’ts
in Trial
by Chris Toll
On September 14, 2007 Judge Wiley Y. Daniel presented at a Faculty
of Federal Advocates Brown Bag at the United States District
Courthouse. Judge Daniel and his topic, “Top 10s
Do’s and Don’ts in Trial,” attracted the largest
crowd ever at a FFA Brown Bag. Judge Daniel gave an energetic
and enlightening talk, earning rave reviews from all in attendance.
While the title of Judge Daniel’s talk promised ten trial
advocacy pointers, in fact he delivered far more than that, covering
a variety of subjects. A nutshell the summary of Judge
Daniel’s talk—minus his many humorous and edifying
anecdotes—is as follows:
- Knowledge of applicable rules. Make
sure you are familiar with the applicable rules of procedure
and evidence, as well as the judge’s practice standards.
- Technology. Get comfortable
with it and use it.
- Motions in limine. Determine
if your judge encourages or discourages them, and expect a
decision only once evidence is heard at trial if the issue
is evidence-driven.
- Pretrial stipulations. Reach
maximum agreement with opposing counsel on exhibits, instructions,
and facts.
- Demeanor. Be appropriate and
respectful with the Court and everyone else involved in the
trial.
- Voir dire. Determine if it
is permitted in your case, and if so use the opportunity to
learn about your prospective jurors.
- Opening statement. Do
not read from notes, have visual aids, and keep it short.
- Scope of evidence. Do
not seek to admit evidence whose admission creates reversible
error.
- Making and responding to objections. Do
not make speaking objections. Cite the applicable rule
succinctly, and when responding do so quickly with counter
authority.
- Listening techniques. Listen
carefully to the testimony and react to what is actually said
rather than to what you expected to hear.
- Use of depositions. Consider
whether to read transcripts or use video, and prune down content
to avoid juror boredom.
- Jury instructions. Read
them thoroughly and be prepared to object to improper instructions. The
senior trial attorney should participate in the instruction
conference.
- Closing argument. Summarize
the evidence accurately and self-impose a time limit.
[top of page]
Congratulations to the University of Denver’s Civil Rights Clinic
by Amy Robertson
The
Faculty of Federal Advocates congratulates the students of DU’s
Civil Rights Clinic and their faculty supervisor, Prof. Laura
Rovner, for their victory on behalf of Mark Jordan, a federal
prisoner challenging a regulation prohibiting inmates from acting
as reporters or publishing under a byline. Mr. Jordan connected
with the Clinic through the FFA’s counsel/co-counsel program.
About The Case
Jordan
v. Pugh was filed by plaintiff Mark Jordan in 2002. Mr.
Jordan, an inmate at the ADX facility in Florence, Colorado,
had published two bylined articles in Off! Magazine, a publication
of an off-campus prisoner rights group at SUNY Binghamton. As
a result, he was disciplined pursuant to a prison regulation
that prohibits an inmate from “acting as a reporter” or “publishing
under a byline.” 28 C.F.R. § 540.20(b). Mr.
Jordan’s complaint asserted both facial and as-applied
challenges to the regulation. Following a number of dispositive
motions and an appeal to the Tenth Circuit, only Mr. Jordan’s
facial challenge remained to be tried.
In
late 2005, Mr. Jordan requested that the Court assist him in
finding representation, and in April 2006, the Clinic was appointed
as his counsel. Prof. Rovner and students Michelle Young,
Jack Hobaugh, and Don Bounds began working on the case. Although
closely supervised by Prof. Rovner, the students were responsible
for litigating the case. They made repeated trips to the
ADX facility to meet with Mr. Jordan and to work with him to
prepare the case. The students briefed and argued motions
and took and defended depositions. Trial preparation consumed
much of the three students’ last semester of law school,
including vacations, and -- with a May 29 trial date looming
-- brought them back to the Clinic to resume work on their graduation
day.
The
case was tried to the Court before Judge Marcia Krieger. The
students made the opening and closing arguments, and responded
to the defendants’ Rule 52 motion following the plaintiff’s
case-in-chief. They also examined Mr. Jordan -- present
by video connection to the prison -- and plaintiff’s experts
and cross-examined defense witnesses. Prof. Rovner sat
with and advised the students at counsel table but did not take
a speaking role at trial. Following the three-day trial,
Judge Krieger took the matter under advisement. On August
9, she handed down her decision, holding that the regulation
was overbroad in violation of the First Amendment. See Jordan
v. Pugh, --- F. Supp. 2d ---, 2007 WL 2288189 (D. Colo. 2007).
Prof.
Rovner expressed appreciation for both the Court and the Assistant
U.S. Attorneys against whom the students litigated. “The
students were treated as attorneys, and were able to gain the
rare educational experience of taking a case all the way to trial,” she
said.
About the Clinic
The Civil Rights Clinic at the University of Denver Sturm College
of Law was founded in 2004 when Prof. Rovner joined the faculty. Although
clinical education has a long history at DU -- marking its 100th
anniversary in 2004 -- previous clinics had practiced only in
Colorado’s state courts. After she arrived, Prof.
Rovner approached the judges of the United States District Court
for the District of Colorado to implement a student practice
rule, permitting students to represent clients before that Court
under the supervision of clinical faculty. (Prof.
Rovner previously wrote for this Newsletter introducing
the Clinic and the student practice rule.) Since
then, students in the Civil Rights Clinic have represented clients
in a number of cases before the federal court here and have worked
on cases addressing fair housing, employment discrimination,
and prisoner civil rights.
[top of page]
Welcome
to Magistrate Judge Kristen Mix
by Lisa Christian
Colorado’s recently appointed United States Magistrate Judge, Kristen
Mix, hails from Buffalo, New York. The daughter of two lawyers, she came
to Colorado in 1980, fresh out of college, to teach American history to ninth
graders at the Colorado Academy in Littleton. The second semester, she taught
a class called “Great Cases Under the Constitution.” She loved
the subject, and it inspired her to enroll at the University of Colorado
Law School.
Judge Mix graduated from the University of Colorado Law School in 1985.
She began her legal career as a commercial litigator, and over the years,
gravitated toward a labor and employment law practice. She has worked with
a series of Denver firms, and most recently was of counsel with Phoenix-based
Snell & Wilmer in Denver. At Snell & Wilmer, her practice included
representing both management and employees in employment termination, discrimination,
non-compete, trade secrets, wage and hour, and related matters. Most of her
extensive litigation experience has been in federal court.
Throughout her career, Judge Mix has generously served the community and
the legal profession through bar association, pro bono, and other professional
activities. Among many other activities, she served on the American Arbitration
Association Employment Law Panel of Neutrals from 2002 to 2007, where she
honed her judge skills by arbitrating and helping to settle several employment
cases. She has long been an active member of the Colorado Bar Association,
where she has served on the Board of Governors, as Chair of the Labor and
Employment Law Committee, and as a member of the Continuing Legal Education
Employment Law Institute Planning Committee. Judge Mix has also been a long-term
member of the Faculty of Federal Advocates. In 2003, she became the co-chair
of the FFA’s committee to prepare model employment law jury instructions.
The committee issued its model instructions in 2005.
Judge Mix has especially enjoyed her work with the Colorado Lawyers Committee.
In the early 1990's, she became involved with the CLC’s Hate Violence
Task Force, which had developed a mock trial to present to high school and
middle school students to educate them about hate crimes. Over the years,
as co-chair of the Hate Violence Task Force, she helped to expand the program
into an entire curriculum about civil rights and tolerance, which the CLC
provided to all middle schools in the state. In 2005, Judge Mix received
the CLC’s Individual of the Year award for her work on the program.
Judge Mix took the bench on August 6, 2007, becoming the third judge in
her family. (Her mother served as a New York State Family Court Judge for
ten years, and after retiring from that court, now serves as a Judicial Hearing
Officer. Her sister is a Family Court Commissioner in Green Bay, Wisconsin.)
The other Colorado Magistrate Judges; Judge Mix’s courtroom deputy,
Ellen Miller; and the entire court staff have provided invaluable help and
guidance during her transition to the bench. She already loves her new position,
which she compares to taking a drink from a fire hose. She especially enjoys
the intellectual challenge that judging presents, and the opportunity to
help the parties settle their disputes. She says that she “loves it
when lawyers help her help them” at settlement conferences by giving
her a detailed settlement statement and telling her what their clients need
to hear. She is also looking forward to the opportunity to conduct trials.
She says that the only thing about being a judge that has surprised her
is the extent to which lawyers treat her differently now. She says she “never
fully understood how funny your jokes are going to be once you get on the
bench.” She wants lawyers to know that she welcomes opportunities to
speak; to share her philosophy; and most important, to help lawyers, their
clients, and the legal profession as a whole.
[top of page]
Welcome to Magistrate Judge Kathleen Tafoya
by Kevin Traskos
Colorado’s newest United States Magistrate Judge, Kathleen M. Tafoya,
learned her way around a courtroom long before law school. From 1978 to 1982,
she worked in the Clerk’s Office for the United States District Court
for the District of Colorado, serving in a variety of positions: at the front
desk, as a courtroom deputy for the magistrate judges, as a jury clerk, and
as a courtroom deputy for the Honorable James Carrigan. She learned the ins
and outs of the courthouse, watched countless trials, listened to jurors’ comments
about the lawyers, and formed her own views about which lawyers’ techniques
worked and which ones did not. And she developed the view that she would
be not a bad judge herself — that she could make the decisions correctly
and fairly
This courthouse experience may be one reason why Judge Tafoya now seems
so at ease in her chambers at the Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse.
She is clearly comfortable in her new position, and she has the natural deportment
of a judge: articulate, professional, no-nonsense, and confident. She still
knows some of the courthouse employees from her time as a clerk twenty years
ago, but enjoys her new role – especially the chance to ride in the
judges’ elevator (which she insists has no flat screen TVs or other
perquisites!).
Lawyers appearing before Judge Tafoya may detect a Texas twang in her voice.
She was born in Houston and spent her first few years in Texas. Her family
moved around the country often – her father was in insurance, and her
mother a homemaker — and she graduated from high school in Indiana.
She attended a year of college there before moving to Colorado in 1968, where
she married and spent the next ten years focused on raising her sons.
After her four years in the Clerk’s office (1978-82), she spent the
next few years working as an intern for two firms – first Dixon & Snow,
then Cooper & Kelley (which since has become Kennedy Childs & Fogg).
She spent days and nights summarizing depositions, often in medical malpractice
cases; those were the days before depositions were computerized and word-searchable.
While holding down those jobs, she somehow also found time to earn her college
degree (in 1984) and her law degree (in 1987), both from the University of
Colorado.
Her first job after law school was with Denver law firm Gorsuch Kirgis Campbell
Walker and Grover, where she worked with a number of excellent lawyers, including
another current jurist, the Honorable Wiley Y. Daniel. She enjoyed the varied
practice, involving everything from divorce cases to complex commercial litigation.
But her idea of being an attorney always had been to be a trial lawyer, and
so she jumped at the chance when United States Attorney Michael Norton offered
her a position in 1990 as an Assistant United States Attorney in the Organized
Crime and Drug Enforcement Task Force. (She jokes that the only reason Norton
hired her is that he knew — because Tafoya’s husband Jim is a
Deputy United States Marshal — that she would pass the background check.
Judge Tafoya had never intended to practice criminal law, and she thought
she would stay on as a prosecutor for only a few years. But she loved the
frequent trial work, and also the complex investigations that preceded indictments,
where she worked closely with law enforcement officers and gained their trust
and respect. Her expertise was complicated drug gang investigations, but
she also spent time handling appeals and prosecuting health care fraud. From
2005 through 2006 she was chosen by the Department of Justice for a special
detail in Washington, D.C., where she assisted the Drug Enforcement Agency
and other agencies with international investigations and complex cases, and
also traveled around the country as a roving expert, training prosecutors
and law enforcement officers on how to conduct narcotics investigations.
She also devoted time to service on the Colorado Women’s Bar Association’s
Judicial Nominating Committee.
After almost eighteen years at the United States Attorney’s Office,
Judge Tafoya was selected as a United States Magistrate Judge in September
2007, and began her service on January 4, 2008. She immediately assumed an
enormous caseload, and has found herself working long hours to move her cases
along as quickly as possible. She observes that for most issues presented
to her, there are good arguments on both sides, and no easy answers. She
has found the civil bar to exhibit somewhat less formality and cordiality
at times than she has been used to with the criminal bar, and urges all attorneys
to show each other — and the court — the utmost respect. She
does not seek to adhere to any overarching judicial philosophy, other than
the consistent effort to be fair and to follow the law. Overall, she has
found her transition so far to be smooth, and compliments her staff and the
court staff on their helpfulness and professionalism.
The formal investiture of Judge Tafoya as a United States Magistrate Judge
was held on March 7, 2008. The standing-room-only attendance was a testament
to her ability to form positive and lasting relationships with many diverse
members of the bar, colleagues and opponents alike. The investiture also
showed her own strong family support network, including her husband Jim Tafoya,
her three sons, and her two grandchildren.
The Faculty of Federal Advocates congratulates Judge Tafoya on her investiture.
[top of page]
Opportunities to Provide Legal Representation,
Develop Federal Court Experience, and Earn CLE Credits
The Faculty welcomes Edward Butler who was appointed as Legal Officer of
the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. Attorneys
who are interested in participating in the Faculty’s Counsel/Co-Counsel
Program should contact Ed Butler. The Counsel/Co-Counsel Program provides
representation in civil cases that, the Judges have determined, are sufficiently
complicated to warrant the appointment of counsel. The program is designed
to provide legal assistance to pro se parties along with a learning opportunity
by pairing more-experienced and less-experienced attorneys. Mr. Butler will
contact attorneys when appropriate cases become available
for appointment.
Additionally, under Rule 260.8 of the Colorado Rules of Civil Procedure,
an attorney providing pro bono representation in Counsel/Co-Counsel case
may receive up to 9 units of credit in a three-year compliance period. If
you handle a Counsel/Co-Counsel case, please carefully review Rule 260.8
to insure that you receive the proper credit for your work.
Interested attorneys may contact Mr. Butler at 303-335-2043 or by email
atEdward_Butler@cod.uscourts.gov.
For more information about the Counsel/Co-Counsel program and the opportunity
to receive CLE credits for this important service, please visit
the Programs and Services section of the Faculty’s website.
[top of page]
Tribute to United States District Judge Philip S. Figa
by Congresswoman Diana Degette
On January 16th, 2008, Congresswoman Diana DeGette offered
a tribute to United States District Court Judge Phillip
S. Figa on the floor of the US Congress. The transcript from the Congressional
Record is available here in
PDF format.
Comments
and Contact Information
IF YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS OR AN ARTICLE YOU WOULD LIKE CONSIDERED
FOR
PUBLICATION PLEASE SUBMIT TO:
FACULTY OF FEDERAL ADVOCATES
PO BOX 12025
DENVER, CO 80212-0025
OR EMAIL: pmurphyffa@aol.com
[top of page]
|